September 22, 2022 - 7:30am
Biotech is entering a new era, with massive US government support: last week the US Government signed an executive order that assigned $2 billion in government funding for ‘high risk, high reward’ biotech projects such as CRISPR gene editing, artificial meat and further development of the mRNA technology behind the Covid vaccine.
With this shift, as I noted last week, a new paradigm of “health” is emerging, not as a default state where doctors are on hand to help get us back to normal when something goes wrong. In the new, transhumanist vision, humans are a kind of meaty machine whose basic functioning can be engineered toward a vision of “health” that’s something more than the default, via biomedical interventions. And doctors are engineers we depend on in perpetuity to keep supplying new and better upgrades.
Last week’s executive order gave another signal that this dream of engineers with limitless power to upgrade nature is increasingly dominant within the world’s only superpower:
In the paragraphs that follow there’s plenty of throat-clearing about protecting against “accidental or deliberate harm”, and safeguarding “United States principles and values and international best practices”. But anyone who feels reassured as a result should glance again at the third sentence in the passage I’ve quoted, which makes it clear that this path of limitless upgrades will be open from the word go to commercial exploitation.
For we already have a well-worked example of how easily “harm” can be redefined, as “values” come under pressure from commercial imperatives: child gender transition. Consider, for example, the different perverse incentives in publicly and privately-funded healthcare systems where this protocol is concerned. In recent years, European nations with publicly funded healthcare systems have rowed back on paediatric gender medicine, for example citing severe side effects and lack of evidence. America, though, has an insurance-based healthcare system, where the incentive is for more and more advanced and expensive interventions — and here, perhaps coincidentally, senior public medical officials call the protocol “essential”, “life-saving” and “evidence-based”.
And while the NHS is closing its only child gender clinic, calling it ‘inadequate’, in the US “gender care” for children is an explosive growth area. The first such US clinic opened in 2007, and there are now (according to the HRC) 50 such institutions, though the real number is probably as high as 300 clinics providing biomedical upgrade services to children.
Of course it’s not just about following the money; it’s also about “values”. America has long valorised those who overcome odds or disregard limits to realise a seemingly impossible dream. So when new technologies promise to overcome our physiological limits, extending that American Dream to human nature itself, no wonder many are enthused. And from this perspective, the “harm” and violation of “values” consists in submitting to unchosen biophysical norms. Here, radical interventions are defended as a means of protecting children from the “trauma” of undergoing “the wrong puberty”.
We are plunging blindly into the so-called “Fourth Industrial Revolution”, guided by an ascendant paradigm that views “harm” as a refusal to intervene in what’s normal and “health” as structurally reliant on ongoing biomedical intervention. The reality, though, often falls short of this hubristic dream. There’s already no shortage of testimony from children who regret having interrupted their normal maturation and irreversibly surgically re-sculpted their bodies in accordance with the transhumanist paradigm of freedom-through-upgrades.
And when we extrapolate the now US Government-backed drive to accelerate biotech innovation, we can reasonably expect these children to be merely the first bow-wave of living collateral damage. If we continue on this path without any framework for defending our normal human organisms as right in themselves, without “upgrades”, there will be plenty more.
Join the discussion
Join like minded readers that support our journalism by becoming a paid subscriber
To join the discussion in the comments, become a paid subscriber.
Join like minded readers that support our journalism, read unlimited articles and enjoy other subscriber-only benefits.
SubscribeWe are so devoid of mystery in modern life. Real, spiritual mystery; a sense there might be something greater than ourselves, that the universe might work according to principles we haven’t begun to understand.
Following the US lead, the Chinese have now landed spacecraft on the moon and Mars. Pretty soon these celestial bodies will resemble base camp at Everest, filled with junk left by rich people paying for the privilege of being guided to the roof of the world.
NASA has provided some remarkable images generated by its latest Mars probe. An impressive technical achievement, for sure. But now the mystery of the red planet is lost. It’s not the red planet anymore but clearly the dead planet covered with dust and rock and the worn down remains of mountain ranges.
I hope there are UFOs or, better yet, the universe really is a dream in the mind of God. I wish I could gaze up at the moon and think of it as Sister Moon rather than just a lump of lifeless rock where nations compete to send increasingly pointless space missions.
The China Mars landing was filmed in a remote bit of Sinkiang. In one shot, for a split second, you can see some barbed wire in the lower left corner. As far as UFOs lets all remember that most famous line from ‘”To Serve Man”‘ in The Twilight Zone:
“Patty cries: “Mr. Chambers, don’t get on that ship! The rest of the book, To Serve Man, it’s… it’s a cookbook!””
A great short story by Damon Knight,read it years ago.
Wasn’t the 1969 Moon Landing filmed in a shed/hangar in Arizona?
I worked in Libya from 1969 to 1971 and this is what the Libyan population truly believed. Because the moon to them was sacred so, by extension no human could possibly. land on it.
Well spotted!
It is a dubious premise that more religious people like Americans would be more likely to believe in aliens. After all, some of them do not seem to believe in dinosaurs.
Unless of course one assumes that someone who believes in God is someone ready to believe anything.
Noah took dinosaur eggs onto the Ark. Hadn’t you heard? And at the Creation Museum in Kentucky, you can witness how dinosaurs roamed the earth alongside us six thousand years ago.
GK Chesterton thought the reverse, that non-belief in God meant that a person would believe in anything. BTW, just this last Sunday, 16 May 2021, the American news show “60 Minutes” had a segment on this very matter. They called them UAP or “Unidentified Aerial Phenomena”, presumably to satisfy those who suspect they aren’t solid objects. I missed the program, but it might be worth checking out for those interested. We Americans characteristically put the month before the day, so 5/16/2021 might be the way to go if you use the date of the show in your search.
Surely the goings on in Area 51 and the UFOs associated with it were encouraged as a cover for the testing of the Blackbird and the rumoured Aurora.
On another matter I saw in the 70s a U2 land and refuel at a very quiet RAF airfield in the South Country. . Of course that never officially happened and RAF police on the gate laughed and told me I was actually imagining the whole thing. About 100 yards from where we were standing. It took off and was quite something to see. Of course it could not be mentioned to anyone .
Bit of trivia. Nevada named its state Hwy. 375 “the extraterrestrial highway.” It’s on the signs. It runs past Area 51, albeit off in the distance, not visible from the road. I once drove 375, which is in the Yonder. Parked the car, turned off the engine, grabbed a cigar, went to the centerline, lit it, and waited. 45 minutes later, a Wal-Mart truck came by. LOL
Nothing will ever equal the terror of Mekon. Leader of the Treens.
Not even Quatermass.
Yes, but much greener!
Funny how Green used to be the colour of evil.
Still is!
“Our words are backed by nuclear weapons!”
I’m a newcomer (furriner) to Quatermass, watched them only last year for the first time. Thoroughly enjoyed. The last series (IV) could have been written just about today’s “Planet People”.
If it was written now, people would insist it was a sly caricature of Dominic Cummings!
There is a resemblance, certainly in the physiognomy.
GANDHI, not Ghandi!
I thought the Mekon looked like a green William Hague.
Plenty of evidence of UFOs. No evidence they’re of intelligent origin, as opposed to weird natural phenomena.
The reasons why I don’t take UFOs seriously are as follows.-
They are not like ghosts. Every part of recorded history has recorded sightings of dead people. So almost certainly ghosts have existed. Not so with objects which could remotely be supposed UFOs.
[1] Each age in the world’s history has sightings of unearthly phenomena which accord with people’s interest in such things at that period.
For instance, round about the time of the Renaissance, people were much interested in fairies; and fairy sightings cropped up all over the place.
We have had almost no claims of anyone seeing fairies for a long time.
With the development of modern astronomy people have speculated about other worlds in the cosmos and the possibility they are inhabited.
Ding dong! UFOs appear; and occupy the place in public fascination and converse which fairies used to take.
[2] How do I explain actual photographs and films of bizarre phenomena for which our state of knowledge (and technology) can give no account?
Satan.
As a Christian, I am aware that one of the tricks the Enemy of Mankind is concerned to play is distraction of us from our real predicament, our real needs and our real duties.
The more that Lucifer can bamboozle humankind with doubts about the veracity of Holy Scripture (suggesting we are not at all living in the kind of universe there specified but some altogether other organum), the better he is pleased.
He is delighted to keep us merely bewildered and agnostic about everything until he can get us to a place where there will be no doubts about the veracity of Holy Scripture. For ever.
You were doing so well with your rationalist debunking of UFOs, until you posited Satan as the real explanation.
Unfourtnately Evil is real. I have been about a great deal and from that I have come to believe, evil, and good, do exist. I think a visit to Auschwitz II-Birkenau site is really important if you get the chance. It is a horrible experience, but one you learn so much by it is very worth doing. The feel of evil lays so heavy on the site you can feel it right to your core. You will never be the same again, I think it was an important part of my life expierence to see it – but I have been in other places of great horror in my travels, and the actual ground can still retain the evil which happened, if it was that great.
Did you ask what happened to the bones on your visit to AW-B?
No, should I have?
I visited the Plasov camp on the edge of Krakov many years ago. The locals said no birds ever sang there. It was a vile place. I remember looking down across the parade ground ( the whole place was derelict) and seeing the golden arches of a brand new MacDonalds on the other side. That was very strange indeed. If you had told one of the people there in 1944 that this fast food joint was going to be built it would have been beyond their comprehension.
Of course evil exits. Perpetuated by man. (Humans).
yawn…
Yes. I rather fear that the ‘place’ so ominously referred to in the ultimate sentence, is in fact Peter Scott’s soundproof dungeon.
Why would any advanced society ever bother with a primitive dump like Planet Earth?
You are Zaphod Beeblebrox and I hereby claim my pan-galactic gargleblaster. Although, I thought you went by the alias “Phil.”
Good question. Not for the resources, that’s for sure. Minerals are obtainable from zero-gravity asteroids for a lot less hassle than from Earth, against whose gravity you’d have to haul them into space. If you somehow had free energy to do this, why would you even still need minerals?
So no, I can’t see any reason for aliens to visit another planet unless it’s idle curiosity, or they’ve wrecked their own, or are in search of interesting specimens to ornament their homes on Zargon 3.
Yes I suspect your are correct.
Probably a navigational error by a Zaragoza 3 Intergalactic Battlecruiser, bound for some remote Penal Control.
Rather like the accidental discovery of St Helena, Tristan da Cunha etc.
You seem to have knowledge of other, better places. Perhaps you could tell us about them.
No following this. How do UFOs bamboozle us with doubts about Scripture? And, for clarification, I’m also a Christian and I’m having a little difficulty tracking the logic of Satan firing up the Millennium Falcon and running the USAF all over the map.
You don’t need a Satan, the human brain is quite capable of bamboozling, hence so many religious beliefs.
Where’s Gabriele Amorth when you need him???
I expect most UFO reports have mundane explanations but I’ll confess to being puzzled by some of them. If someone has a good, mundane explanation of the reports of lots of tic-tac shaped objects near the US navy, I’ll be quite happy. Personally, I’m inclined to suspect they are actually craft being secretly developed by the US.
Occam’s Razor applies.
UFOs being alien or time-travelling craft requires one to postulate and accept some pretty far-fetched assumptions.
UFOs being the science project of some bit of the US defence complex that the rest doesn’t know about, like for example the Manhattan Project was, requires no new thing at all because it is already known to happen.
The V173 “Flying Pancake” of 1942 was a constructive flying saucer, the 1958 Avrocar was an actual flying saucer, the HL-10 that The Six Million Dollar Man crashed in the opening credits was a wingless “lifting body” aircraft where the fuselage provided the lift, the X36 looked like two Xs in flight with no obvious wings or tail, and if in the 1930s you had only ever seen conventional aircraft as often as most people had, I can’t imagine what you’d have made of the various Focke-Achgelis prot-helicopter efforts of the late 30s and early 40s.
Your first sentence says it all. There is only one thing we know with absolute certainty about them, and that is that they are on THIS planet. To conclude that they are from another planet is throwing Occam’s razor into a black hole.
The point is in the name. UFO. It’s an object in the sky that is unidentified. There is no claim in the name that these are in any way extraterrestrial. That they may be is another subject entirely.
I undertook an aeronautical structural engineering sandwich course apprenticeship, (the first and only girl) in what is now BAE systems, back in 1961 to 1964 and was working on the Concord design (the ‘e’ was added later to appease the French). There was a lot of serious discussion then about extraterrestrial object sightings amongst very senior engineer designers and RAF higher-ups. Much information was classified. This is not new.
There is plenty of evidence that many UFOs stories were planted in the US as a way to stop people asking to many questions about the very real secret weapons programs that were (and undoubtedly still are) being developed.
Do I believe in UFOs?
Of course.
“What is that object up there in the sky?”
“I don’t know”
“Nor do I”
That is, definitionally, a UFO.
But do I believe that there is a Govt conspiracy covering up the existence of alien life forms sophisticated enough to make interstellar journeys and then joy-ride through our airspace?
No.
It’s not beyond belief that such creatures exist, but I find it quite impossible to believe that Govt’s – of any stripe – could keep the matter secret. Why would they? Contact with aliens would be any politician’s dream ticket. All other problems would become insignificant overnight.
“Earthlings, we come in peace. We bring you a gift of our technology: this device turns social justice warriors and Twitter bullies into clean, free energy.”
Boris’ majority would go up to about 150.
Thanks for a welcome giggle.
See my earlier post.
Rational people understand that a sensible discussion should be concerned with the relative plausibilities of various possible explanations for UFOs, not just the possibilities themselves. [And an informed discussion is necessary for a sensible assignment of relative plausibilities.]
It is still worthwhile to study what the USAF is seeing and detecting, there’s something there it would appear.
It’s almost certainly not aliens though, because, well, what are the odds?
That alien life exists somewhere in the universe is almost certain, if not common.
That intelligent alien life exists somewhere in the universe is probable but bound to be less common.
Intelligent, industrialised life AND close enough to us in what is a very, very big universe to hang around bothering US air force pilots? Really?
I’m no statistician but that doesn’t seem very likely.
My feeling is that there’s probably some insight to be had into how helium party balloons behave at high altitude or drones or some other prosaic thing. Pity, as I love Sci Fi, “I want to believe” as they say but I’ll stick to Iain M. Banks who I heartily recommend.
Don’t forget that it is not that long ago that we heard a wonderful debate on UFOs in the House of Lords. I have the published transcript – I do not refer to it often.
Don’t forget that it is not that long ago that we heard a wonderful debate on UFOs in the House of Lords. I have the published transcript – I do not refer to it often.
Have you not heard of Nick Pope? He investigated these phenomena while working for the British Ministry of Defense, and he is a true believer, very compelling. I invite all of the snickerers to read works by the French computer scientist Jacques Vallee. Disclosure is near at hand, so it’s time for all serious people to confront the reality of it.
See my earlier post.
See my earlier post.
Have you not heard of Nick Pope? He investigated these phenomena while working for the British Ministry of Defense, and he is a true believer, very compelling. I invite all of the snickerers to read works by the French computer scientist Jacques Vallee. Disclosure is near at hand, so it’s time for all serious people to confront the reality of it.
So why the difference between the US and UK on UFOs?
In addition to the above mentioned differences in the size of the two militaries and the differences in security, perhaps the U.S. military has invented all kinds of objects that they have flying and/or orbiting up there, and they think that other countries might also have done so. It would make perfect sense to keep all of these sightings under cover, just as they would protect any new weapons or security system. Even when the flying objects become known, it is not a smart military move to broadcast what they are and what country put them up there.
It sounds to me like propaganda for the new US Space Force, which will no doubt be wanting a huge and ever-expanding budget and enough weaponry to take on the Intergalactic Star Fleet – or ensure full spectrum dominance of this planet. After all, “the most importance evidence in this matter comes from the US military.”
I hope this opens the Cryptozology field some more. When I tell my Yeti story people sometimes kind of roll their eyes a bit – even wiki dismisses it as :”Cryptozoology is a pseudoscience”. I never had anything to do with UFOs much, although I have heard many people tell me their UFO stories, but most of them were kind of suspect kinds, but not all, I also have heard stories from military men.
David Icke may gain from all this, his Lizard theory, which is a theme throughout the past from Heinlein to Hunter S Thompson, and that picture of Biden showing a bit of a tail which has disappeared from the internet, are so much smoke there may well be fire.. It would finally make sense of what the Democrats are doing.
I see some Lizard Wumao has down voted my comment.
Interesting
Brits believe in ghosts, while Americans believe in UFOs.
Brits believe in ghosts, while Americans believe in UFOs.